Tuesday, October 03, 2006

The Divorce of Love and Hate

I hope the Joseph Campbell estate will forgive me for quoting at such length from Hero With a Thousand Faces, but what I read yesterday was so marvelous, and so directly applicable to our current world situation, that I just can’t bring myself to edit it down to something pithy yet incomplete. It’s from the “Apotheosis” section of Chapter 1:
...Hence, too, the irresistible compulsion to make war: the impulse to destroy the father is continually transforming itself into public violence.... A new and larger paradise is thus established. But this paradise does not include the traditional enemy tribes, or races, against whom aggression is still systematically projected. All of the “good” father-mother content is saved for home, while the “bad” is flung abroad and about: “for who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should defy the armies of the living God?” “And slacken not in following up the enemy: if ye are suffering hardships, they are suffering similar hardships; but ye have hope from Allah, while they have none.”

Totem, tribal, racial, and aggressively missionizing cults represent only partial solutions of the psychological problem of subduing hate by love; they only partially initiate. Ego is not annihilated in them; rather, it is enlarged; instead of thinking only of himself, the individual becomes dedicated to the whole of his society. The rest of the world meanwhile (that is to say, by far the greater portion of mankind) is left outside the sphere of his sympathy and protection because outside the sphere of protection of his god. And there takes place, then, that dramatic divorce of the two principles of love and hate which the pages of history so bountifully illustrate. Instead of clearing his own heart the zealot tries to clear the world. The laws of the City of God are applied only to his in-group (tribe, church, nation, class, or what not) while the fire of a perpetual holy war is hurled (with good conscience, and indeed a sense of pious service) against whatever uncircumcised, barbarian, heathen, “native,” or alien people happens to occupy the position of neighbor.

...Even the so-called Christian nations--which are supposed to be following a “World” Redeemer--are better known to history for their colonial barbarity and internecine strife than for any practical display of that unconditioned love, synonymous with the effective conquest of ego, ego’s world, and ego’s tribal god, which was taught by their professed supreme Lord....

The good news, which the World Redeemer brings and which so many have been glad to hear, zealous to preach, but reluctant, apparently to demonstrate, is that God is love, that He can be, and is to be, loved, and that all without exception are his children. Such comparatively trivial matters as the remaining details of the credo…are merely pedantic snares, unless kept ancillary to the major teaching.... One would think that we had been called upon to decide or to know whom, of all of us, the Father prefers. Whereas, the teaching is much less flattering: “Judge not, that ye be not judged.” The World Savior’s cross, in spite of the behavior of its professed priests, is a vastly more democratic symbol than the local flag.

And we need look no further for an illustration of this love in action than yesterday’s horrific murders in the Amish schoolhouse. The Amish community is shocked and devastated, yes; but as a USA Today article quotes an expert saying, “They’ll try to express to their forgiveness” to the gunman’s widow. In a time when sorrow and tragedy can be found in every direction, only the Amish seem to have remembered the truest teaching of their religion.

No comments: